Hey, AI – leave sneezing panda alone!

I’m like you.

I too like scrolling through social media and finding clips of CCTV or candid camera of those videos.

You know the ones.

They feature the impossible trick shot, the extraordinary comedic coincidence, miraculous creativity – that make us want to watch again but also put down the phone and head outdoors into the real world.

I suppose, for all the sensational terms I’ve used above, the real definition is ‘hopeful’.

Everyone loves these videos.

You see them and you are reminded that life is actually pretty cool, maybe you’ll go for a walk.

Here’s the problem. AI is being used by living people.

That’s not to say that the deceased would make better use of it, but it is those currently living that are, as ever, the problem.

And they’re using AI.

To do what?

It’s not just their taxes, their spreadsheets, or their wedding speeches.

They’re using it to fake those moments of real life that are the romantic and true chaos that remind us of it’s unruly splendour.

I’m talking about, dear reader, the sneezing panda.

When scrolling social media, you may have noticed an increase in attempts at this type of reality. AI attempts at the glorious moments that make us smile and love the world.

In December 2025, the AI in use is still not capable in application to falsify such important moments as these (I’d also very much so like to include the Aussie chap punching a kangaroo) fluidly or effectively.

My worry is that it won’t be long till they can.

And when that time comes, how can I believe that those lovely little moments are real any more?

Those moments, which I personally consider to be the entire point of social media and why at some point in the 20th Century we began filming each other constantly, are the tickety-boo examples of what screens are for.

It’s not emailing (don’t do it – it’s uncouth).

It’s not online files involving finances (yuck).

It’s not web-dating (less-so but still yuck).

It’s not even sharing government secrets with San Marino (sure they’re a tiny country, but they want to know some secrets too).

It is funny cats (you know this already)

It is Gangnam Style (which seems quite AI but wonderfully, isn’t).

It is The Ultimate Showdown of Ultimate Destiny (Mr Rogers is the greatest thing – confirmed).

It is the Dramatic Chipmunk, Chocolate Rain, Keyboard Cat, Charlie Bit My Finger, and that other one I can’t recall the name of….

But it’s not AI’s fault.

It’s people, as ever.

People start wars, people spread plagues, and people misuse AI to upset the proper flow of funny cat videos that ensured my faith in life persists like life itself.

This is the same issue that is the centre about most people’s concerns about AI – it’s not the Ai itself: it’s some person, being very regrettable, using it as they shouldn’t.

But what can I do about it?

Well, I’m going to use AI a little less often. I’ve taken to using AI to create thumbnails for this blog.

From now on, you can expect some truly awful drawings, made using my children’s crayons, that I will photograph and upload to accompany every equally awful blog on this site.

I’m doing it for the sneezing panda, you, and myself.

Apologies for that.

Species defining imperfections on the way.

Sam


My baby girl thinks I’m pretty great

I took her to the shops today.

She had a massive poo whilst driving there and she handled it like a champ. So did I.

In the rear-view-mirror, her face was doing the typical contortions of one expelling, what I’m sure we can all agree is amongst the worst things ever, a poop – whilst Daddy is singing along to Jessie-Jay on the radio in an attempt to make the whole scene more…musical?

By the time we arrived, her complexion had returned from hellish-rouge to healthy-human, and the gargles and goo-goos were back aplenty, ready for a nappy-change.

Then came my might – the thing of which I am without question the best of in the world:
distractingly amusing sounds and funny faces.

It’s a big difference between babies and men. I’ve never encountered a face so funny, or a sound so amusing, that I wouldn’t know my nappy was being changed.

My daughter was oblivious. At seven months, she generally is.

The amount of things my daughter doesn’t pick-up on is only dwarfed by sheer number of things she picks up and puts in her mouth.

But in the car’s boot, with nothing in reach to distract, it was down to the irresistible power of my face and the sounds that come out of it to make the following two minutes less awful.

There was poo, there was laughter, and there was the risk of each overwhelming both of us – but we persevered, and went shopping.

The dirty nappy went in the shop bin, my daughter went in the pram, and I went into performance mode.

An integral part of fatherhood is taking blows to the brain.

They’re both the height and depths of humour, and like her older siblings, my youngest baby girl loves to laugh at when I do what I do best.

A proportion of those impacts are something I suppose I’m proud:

  • My son (6) hitting me in the head with sporting equipment, for humorous purposes.
  • My eldest daughter (4) hitting me in the head with props, for amateur dramatics purposes.
  • Me (36) hitting myself in the head with whatever is nearest to hand, for competitive purposes (can’t let me son out-do me)
  • And my wife (N/A) hitting me in the head, for reasonable purposes.

The third of those – hitting myself in the brain – goes down something-smashing when it comes to fathering a baby girl.

If you’d like some hints as to what to grab for self-brain-bashing, I’d recommend whatever is nearest to hand for the sake of speed, but noise and colour should be appreciated for the awesome power they hold: like tins of beans and tinsel.

There’s a lot of tinsel at the shop, for arboreal/cultural purposes at this time of year, but no one there knows it’s also for brain-bashing purposes. Same for the tinned beans – it’s got nothing to do with fibre.

I’m struggling to write this blog, due in part to the regular severity of the impacts to my brain which cause such delightful bursts of laughter or, even better, the shining smiles of pure happiness from my baby girl.

It’s also due to the effects of the lychee-liqueur which has thus far turned out to be a wonderful purchase, with the promise of it being less-so tomorrow morning.

Then came the pram ‘uh-ohs’ – in which I push the pram, daughter nonchalantly perched within, away and panic in what I’d best describe as in a ‘flappy headed’ way, before pulling her back with a hint of a jolt but with my own laughing smile upon arrival – matched and soundly beaten only by hers.

She really is the most adorably scrumptious of little things that there ever could be, and you might feel the same about your offspring but I’m right because this is my blog and I’m right.

Take your own kids shopping – I’m occupied with the best thing since someone had the bright idea of having things under the sun, and sliced bread.

Due to what I presume to be a clerical error (by which I mean ecclesiastical rather than administrative) – I find there are no baskets proffered in the shop entrance, meaning I have to load items for purchase beneath the pram itself.

Here’s an opportunity to vanish and return, aka ‘Peekabo’.

With each item loaded onto the conveyer belt towards the till, I duck out. Briefly (and I really do mean briefly – I doubt I’ve ever been briefer), I’m away and suddenly I’m back – and sure enough I’m hitting myself in the same head from which funny noises and faces are emitting.

And she’s smiling joyously. The kind of joy you don’t remember.

From there it’s pay, parking ticket, load stuff in the car, daughter in her car-seat (featuring multiple checks on the way home to ensure I definitely packed her), visor down as the sun sets early this time of year, bish, bash, bosh, I’m a dad.

And the smiles and laughter, in addition to the excited little kicks of the even-littler legs, tells me all I’ve ever really needed to know: my baby girl thinks I’m pretty great.

Sam


Getting to know your audience as a writer

Don’t.

Can you imagine? Ghastly.

Do you really want to associate with the sort of people who are inclined to read a blog like this?

Instead, get to know yourself, not your audience.

They are lucky if they happen upon you.

Focus on getting out what you want to share from within.

Use the words that only you know how to put in that particular sequence (or sparce lack thereof) and say what you’re thinking, feeling…writing.

Be unappreciated in your own time.

I am.

I try to be.

The pay is terrible but the hours saved from opening royalty checks makes it worth while.

If you want this to work, remember this is about WRITING.

READING only enters the picture as an afterthought (minus proofreading) and shouldn’t be encouraged.

All it takes is a little bit more YOU, and a little bit less THEM.

This writing, these words, are by and for you.

Write YOU.

E.g. I’ve spent approximately 8 minutes writing the above, and I feel better already

Not time well spent, perhaps, but then again I’m unappreciated in my own time – so when it comes to wasting hours; I’m loaded.

Sam

P.S Unrelated but I wanted to quickly emphasise that not all units of measurement are for polite company. I can’t be the only one. But I’ll follow-up on that.


Hey, stop being a dead guy

Being all deceased in the corner over there.

Knock it off.

Act your age – you’re not ancient yet.

You’re starting to pong though.

Yes, ponging might be a sign of vibrant living, but I think you’re being a dead guy.

Is that your coffin?

Oh, you like coffins do you? Convenient and simple?

Well no, I don’t like them actually, I think they’re morbid to the point of you being a dead guy and you won’t admit it.

Look! You’re all stiff. Very inconvenient, what if there was a fire?

Convenient for a cremation, oh yes very droll, what with the coffin and all.

Definitely ponging though.

And you’re swelling, don’t deny it.

I’m not going to get too close, in case your pong pops. Gross.

Maybe if you behaved a bit differently, conducted yourself more properly, you wouldn’t give off this deadness.

It’s all about your attitude.

You’re coming across as someone who’s just wasting their time.

Stop being a dead guy, you big smelly metaphor.

Sam


Social media: nothing has changed. But we must.

About a year ago (when would have been a good time to share publish this blog) – there was a great deal made of ‘X’ (then, and forever really, ‘Twitter’) becoming a platform permitting right-wing content, bullying and dangerous topics.

I myself didn’t notice any difference, the only real impact being that WordPress would no-longer be so easily shareable to the X site.

Perhaps, it depends on where on the X site you’re looking. I wasn’t really looking at right-wing, bullying or dangerous things, so that might be why. I just desperately scrawling through it to see who was sharing blogs about what they had for breakfast.

But there was no change I could tell.

I did notice, however, that there was something still a major factor of social media. As I spent hours scrolling and scrolling through the content on X, Instagram, and Facebook, it eventually dawned on me that social media is a profound waste of time.

And I’ve only got so much time, and I need it to write about my breakfast (today, toast. Tomorrow, the world!).

Hasn’t it always been a waste of time? Perhaps a cool waste of time? Especially X?

In my life, Facebook was the original place to waste time: posting pointless updates featuring the latest and most hip abbreviations, sharing photos of people literally just sitting around with a variety of hand gestures, and ‘liking’ pages ranging from an esoteric movie (Ergo: “Hey, I’m esoteric, like this movie.“) to (and I don’t know what to call this): a page titled “Hey it’s snowing! Brilliant!“.

Photos continued to be shared on Facebook through my 20s, and now I can’t delete the damn thing because it is the sole location of my kid’s baby photos. Mine too, probably.

Twitter was meant to be the means by which my extraordinary blog would be shared with soon-to-be adoring fans, as well as a foundation for further research into the absurdly interesting concepts that I could soon write about.

But then, I was ‘followed’ by a local carpet shop in my home town and I realised its proclivity for wasted time was confirmed. They still follow-me, and they too don’t seem any more right-wing than usual (likely due to going out-of-business several years ago).

Instagram is brilliant, the best way to share images and video. A great place for a blog, surely.

Otherwise, every other social media seems to be the same.

TikTok only seems to differ from Instagram as it is a means of People’s Republic of China’s subversion of Western stability, whilst Instagram is less-so. Instagram is best at short videos, YouTube long ones, TikTok pro-sedition ones.

Rest assured, what we had for breakfast can be duly shared on each of these.

My point is that the whilst there’s focus of each social media, the fact is they’re all broadly a waste of time.

Yes, I’m sure you too have heard of people who met their one-true love on Facebook, or are making money from Instagram, or even using the platform to share truly inspiring content. But you’re not, you didn’t and you likely won’t.

You did, however, waste your time. And not in the right way.

Remember that time on Facebook when there was a specific scenario benefiting you with brilliant life-experience a great tale to tell? No, of course not. Exactly the same as when you were on Twitter and nothing proceeded to happen there either.

It’s better to have a bad day in bad weather than to waste time on social media.

That way, you can either make good use of time or waste it too, but it’ll be real-life. Which is useful either way. More social media – less you.

Social media is not an experience.

We’re programmed to find ways to use and waste time as humans. Look at me writing this blog – a far more productive way to waste time.

Ultimately, social media hasn’t changed. It didn’t need to. Neither did we, but we do now.

Waste time in real life, not online.

Sam


The Syrian Civil War – remember?

I wrote recently about these times being the times to write, and to write about.

We can pause, briefly, and quickly we realise these are just about to be the ‘good old days’.

In 20 years, when this world is a new one, will we look back and wonder what we were thinking? In 100 years, will other looks back and try to understand not only what we were thinking, but also what we had for breakfast (this is a blog after all. Toast, by the way.)?

It’s odd to consider myself a very distant bystander to world events and only as involved in them as I am with Countdown (barely, and eager for less).

But I am.

Seeing it on a plethora of screens, on the radio and even, yes – still, in print…these are the times to write and write about; but also to keep one’s distance from.

The Syrian Civil War is a conflict which, I expect, will come to be known by new names in time. Preferred terms of the victors, either romanticised by traditional historians or made technical by other historians eager to sell books by clarifying that everything is in fact very dull.

Maybe a more romantic name would have kept it in my memory.

I can’t be alone in the West in realising I’d forgotten it was happening.

There’s been lots of wars and conflicts in my 35 years of life, and throughout each I’ve slept well with a fully belly and total expectation of waking for the next morning.

This war, like so many others we’re made to know of, doesn’t seem to be of effect in my life.

Would I like it to be of effect? No. But it would make it real.

Is it not real already? Yes of course, for those living it.

But for me…I’d forgotten about it. Or at least, I was surprised to understand it was still going on.

S’cuse me while I quickly go Googling.

Best part of a million people have died in this war since 2011. It is hard to fathom how extraordinary that number is over that amount of time. It’s a lot of violence.

Maybe too much violence, but not ‘too much’ in the way it should be.

It is too much violence after too much violence. Too samey. Repetition is not good. Repetition is not good.

And that’s not good for viewership.

And I expect that’s why the war and it’s hundred of thousands of deaths fell out of my mind.

Recently though, we have an odd celebrity/fraud scenario in which ‘Hawk Tuah Girl’ became popular following a street interview regarding oral sex, coined a phrase, became a viral sensation (the Syrian Civil War was still happening prior, during and after all this by the way) began a podcast (apparently hard not to) and released a form of crypto-currency in a manner broadly considered to be fraudulent to investors.

Out of the two, the scam and the Syrian Civil War, I prefer the scam as general news. Whilst tempting to say it is depressing too, I think it’s actually affirming.

Not of the fact people will genuinely invest vast amounts of real money into vast amounts of no money, but that the girl provided something with which people could elect to be stupid.

And it’s my right to select something stupid to do.

Other people would have done that for free, but this young lady has made real money from the nothingness (nothingness with a catchphrase).

All the top people are calling for justice in this case, all whilst – I can’t stress this enough – the Syrian Civil War is still going on.

Although, I now understand the Syrian President, Bashar al-Assad, has gone missing whilst rebels occupy the streets of Damascus.

How and when did this anti-government push come about? Was it via a sudden injection of fictional-funds in the form of HAWK dollars?

Would the government forces have faired better if they’d had an obscene catchphrase?

I don’t know.

Repetition is bad, but I don’t know.

Ultimately, I suppose all this – the war and the scam – could have been continuing on their respective timelines. It’s just odd that one seems to have become so prevalent.

Maybe that catchphrase idea isn’t a bad one. I know if the ‘Post Office Scandal’ didn’t include the words ‘post office’ – it wouldn’t have deterred so many from wanting to know about it.

And of course, I’m glad to be at a distance. I just don’t think I should be forgetting about the history that’s about to be.

These are still the times to write, and write about. I think we need to know more about the Syrian Civil War and the experiences of those living it, and the lives of those who no longer are.

I’d invest in that.

Sam


Are we not allowed to be a bit shit? ‘Presidentially shit’?

Biden has, for the previous few years, been degraded on a manner of counts.

One – he’s President, and that’s unforgivable to many.

Two – he’s Democrat, and I know some people who hate that kind of party.

Three – the Afghanistan withdrawal, an undemocratic vendetta against Trump, being too fragile in all capacities and appearing goofy of a kind only previously espoused by Bush jnr.

This week President Biden pardoned his son of crimes he definitely did, after promising he definitely wouldn’t.

The Oval Office has such power, but it is also proudly presumed that this power is not to be used in a way that results in poor PR.

‘Optics’ are a crucial component of the American mythos, and the Constitution guarantees this purely through the way it is written. It presumes innocence of purpose with absolute power of authority.

Biden was a father before a President.

Evidently.

And if Biden jnr makes his way across the world now, taking drugs and owning firearms for which he doesn’t have a license….fine.

If he continues to be a figurehead of funding, receiving millions of dollars from the arrangements of his father….fine.

In honesty, this is something I expect of government, modern and historical. It’s the premise of the opportunity of governing: you don’t have to worry about particular things because we know you’re busy enough.

Of course, you can also sway a nation towards better times, with a better identity, but you can also get your little boy (I’m a father and I think this perception will never truly diminish) off of drug and firearm charges.

I’d do the same.

I’d ruin the optics of the constitution in favour of the reality of the Declaration.

Pursuing happiness.

The guy needs help, not jail time.

And President Biden needs to do what he still perceives (cataracts aside) as the right thing, which as a father myself – I’d do too…..fine.

Because we’re accordingly all a bit shit (Biden is ‘Presidentially shit’!). Because we’re human. And prideful optics are easily surrendered for the cause we hold more important – which is family.

What does that mean for me and you – those without Presidential representation and power? It means we were as previous: wishing our Dad’s could save the day because we’re a bit shit.

Biden jnr needs non-negotiable therapy. President Biden needs a nap.

And we need to appreciate that we’d protect ours too, when the occasion presents itself.

Obviously.

Otherwise you’d be a bad father. And that makes for a bad president. And that bodes poorly for all.


RayGunn – breaking Breaking at an Olympic level

Firstly, put an end to the Olympics. They’re not immoral quite yet, but in a few years we’ll realise it and so putting a stop to it now saves time.

Secondly, let’s rely on ridiculousness. Because that’s what it all very much so is. Ridiculous.

Whilst some competitions are undoubtedly impressive – weightlifting, running, shotput, wrestling, etc. They’re all also, largely, non-applicable.

Sure, one might suddenly find oneself needing to leap over a 2-meter fence, or swimming as a team in a frighteningly in-sync manner, but aside from those specific circumstances – its all unnecessary.

Breakdancing, or as I’ve learnt it is also called – ‘Breaking’, is not necessary an act. Rarely will you have to spin your legs whilst walking on your hands, or impersonate a kangaroo for some reason.

You don’t need to do that. Unless you’re being an artist.

As an artist, spinning your legs whilst walking on your hands, and especially – ESPECIALLY – impersonating a kangaroo; is essential.

Probably.

I, likely like you, know nothing about Breaking – similar I suspect to most people everywhere.

I don’t know what the point is, the objectives or demonstration of style, in terms of it being a competition. Why and how to gain a point – I’ve no idea.

Also like most people, I grew up with Hollywood portraying Breaking as ultra-athletic spinning, flipping at crooked angles and bouncing on your head in a very work-casual manner.

That’s an essential point in the understanding the potential misunderstanding.

It’s not just meant to be athletic and impressive.

Potentially – it can be just artistic and revealing.

Maybe, I don’t know anything about what I’m talking about.

This most recent Olympics, 2024 in Paris, Aussie Raygun performed a routine that was unathletic, and thus accordingly – unimpressive.

That maybe was intended; to demonstrate a Breaking routine that reveals your artistic vision (breaking away from the athletic standards of the rest of the Olympics).

Watching the routine, I was reminded of interpretive dance. Yes, that interpretive dance – the kind you’re all thinking of when you read that. The same sort as demonstrated by God in Family Guy, or by Marty the landlord in the The Big Lebowski.

Raygun put on a show that was interpretive dance, not sport.

But there’s more to this.

I watched one of her full routines. I did not see the routine of her opponent. I didn’t get their name, nationality, or any indication into how good it was – either artistically or athletically.

What did I miss?

A problem for the Olympics, aside from the many that aren’t my point here, is configuring how to score artistic points over athletic point scoring. And then it’s justifying arts being a part of the Olympics. And then the dire need to justify inclusion so as to retain a TV audience that mainly tunes-in for the opening ceremonies and a couple of finals.

There’s always going to be a furor when new directions are taken, especially when poorly considered and explained.

I suspect, Raygun’s contribution was artistic and not what Hollywood has previously depicted.

As interpretive dance – it was pretty cool. Athletically lame (observe comparatively to gymnastics), but it was otherwise cool.

I didn’t like the grasping her chin thing, but otherwise…I like the kangaroo.

That said – I don’t know know what I’m talking about on Breaking – likely similar to you.

My advice to Raygun in response to the attention coming her way is to enjoy her family, friends and her academic career. See if you can make an Aussie buck or two, but mostly – under this spotlight – direct people to where they can learn more about this sport (art?) you love.

At least she went for it. Most people just write things online (see samsywoodsy.com).

Sam


It’s all about the environment. Mine, not yours.

MAYBE, it’s about everyone’s environment, but that’s only if it turns out to be more helpful than I am currently intending.

Also, I’m not talking about the environment in that ecological, greater-crested newt, save the wales, sense.

Of course, I’m all in favour of saving the wales. Unless they cross me, in which case I’m moving to Japan.

I’m talking about the environment in that personal sense. MY environment.

The price of a pint of beer is important for this.

I tend not to drink in pubs on account of the cost. I drink at home, a lot, to the point of not going to the doctor in case they give me bad news and I can’t do it anymore.

However, there is a time (maybe, who cares) and more importantly there is a place in which the tipping of the bank balance is more acceptable, on account of really enjoying the environment.

The pub.

The pub is an environment, and it is very important because it is exceedingly lovely.

But what makes it so lovely, and therefore important?

I think it’s:

holding the glass of local beer after a long morning in town staring at classic cars on behalf of an enthusiast to whom I’m related, in the sun-trap garden with a breeze passing through, and a friendly greyhound coming up to sniff hello whilst children are playing and pleasantly misbehaving with the fish in the pond because of something I demonstrated earlier (“the fish bite if you put your fingers in – see?“), folk nearby talking about things I feel are not fascinating but are still something to which I could contribute in an emergency, another glass of increasingly local (is it? Who cares?) beer, my wife suddenly remembered that she’s stunning and is keen to share that with me, my children ask me adorable requests akin to wanting to sit on my knee or have a peanut, I make a political point to my wife and she responds just “hmmm, yes babe” but I’m still glad I said it, before heading inside to the tiny bar in the cooler darkness that reeks of British tradition, where there is a hat perched on a hook in the wall beneath a plaque saying “DAD” with a degree of loving aggressiveness one really had to be there for, and I’m asked if I’d like another, “No, water please” I counter but add that I’d love a pickled egg to accompany , that sates us both (him – my money, me – his egg), and I wrap said-egg in a tissue and place in my pocket and this is all marvelous, just marvelous, and I’ve spent here on two pints and an egg (that everyone hated) what would amount to much beer and many eggs from elsewhere to enjoy at home, but you’re then basically just at home – drunk with eggs.

That was all environment and also, I’m sorry, exquisite grammar.

Really, the importance of it was that it mattered at the time.

And then I realised I couldn’t escape the concept of environments. Such as the fish in the pond with fingers poking-in for the hope of being nibbled – that’s an environment.

Or the pocket with a parceled pickled egg in it – now I had the choice of pocket environments. One to act as a pocket in the traditional, common-or-garden sense, whilst the other now became an environment in which I could put things that I wanted to become smelly.

Naturally it didn’t end there, as we made our way back to the car park (another environment? No, probably not that one) we noticed a nearby shrine to St. Jude.

Here, in the sanctified silence broken only by the taps of my daughter’s feet as she danced in the kaleidoscope of colours from the stained windows and the summer sun, and of the whispers of my son asking “what’s a shrine?“; we felt another environment.

This one was of the kind with the mix of emotions that often comes when religion really matters to people on a daily level – a mix of hope yet desperation, glory yet pity, endless mercy and love, and a donation box in every possible eyeline, a place to place your intimate prayers, and a giftshop.

That’s what you pay for, much akin to two pints of Spitfire and a pickled egg. Plus a copy of the Catholic Herald that I stole (they’ll forgive me). Anyway, I donate to churches every time I light one of their candles, which I do almost every time I enter one, including this of St. Jude’s shrine.

I do go to church fairly often. Often, but not religiously.

There was a woman who sat alone and away from the shrine, in the chapel, who was fervently seeing-to a colouring book as though it had wronged her and she’d have her vengeance in primary colours. She looked up and asked my 5-year-old son if he’s like to colour-in too. He declined politely* and she looked back down to her traumatic colour-scape and never looked up again.

Her head. That was an environment; a very busy one that I don’t want to visit.

Exiting can be a lovely thing when it is stepping out from the gravitas of a softly sounding, aroma-filled cellar environment that pubs and chapels can share, into the relative outer-space of a blue-skied day. So we did, and it was.

A whole new environment. Stepping out into this, I thought as my son and I peed on a nearby secluded wall, was a matter of perception creating a new environment, whilst at the time of stepping into the shrine – the point had been vice-versa.

We arrived at the car, buckled up and cranked the air-conditioning to as low and powerful as it could be; creating another environment in which we controlled the climate, the radio, the view (depending on where we drove), and all with the feeling of togetherness that comes when a family in a car knows that everyone else is strapped in there with them.

This last one, the environment of the family bubble, I realised was the one that had been there throughout the day, and was the one I was taking home.

My advice is to alter your environment to make it what you want, therein making your self think and feel as you’d prefer – or to at least give yourself a better chance to.

Some might try beer, others religion, some are for summer, some for wherever the air-conditioning is best.

Mine is the lot, all, with varying intervals and different levels of intensity, before moving onto the next as per whatever the hell I feel like. It gets me thinking, appreciating, and moving.

What’s my gift though, that I’ll treasure beyond the wagers of the mercy of saints or the business of a barman, was being able to go home with and to my family.

Cheesy, I know, but that’s nothing compared to that pickled egg. Maybe this blog might have turned out to be helpful after all.

*Much as I have been for the past 20 years; in polite decline.


The internet isn’t sexy, and it isn’t helping

I was distracted after writing the above title, by brief segment from a chat-show featuring a guest speaking about why having core stability is important for Formula One racing.

Apparently, it’s very important. For Formula One racing.

I don’t like Formula One racing, though I admit I’ve a soft spot for core stability.

The time I spent on the…….sorry I became distracted again and started browsing for cigars online.

The internet – it is distracting, and not in a good way.

The internet is only as wonderful as it is – and that’s about it.

When I think of the internet being most useful and worth keeping, I picture vital research being finalised in a lab in Australia thanks to some AI programming, then being discussed on a video-conference-call with Europe-based colleagues, and then shared with a children’s hospital when it saves a baby’s life in the nick of time. And then the news is celebrated amongst Facebook friends.

Yes, there’s also music, online communities, access of life-saving information, and occasionally – OCCASIONALLY – a funny video of a cat having a slightly bad time; all of which is tremendous.

Otherwise, it is a unsexy place – location undetermined but seemingly everywhere – and stopping people from approaching one another normally. Of course, ‘normally’ for humans – online or ‘off’ (I like that term – I am “off) will remain as strange as it ever was before, thanks to people having it within their DNA to make things interesting.

These engagements don’t need to be online. It is preferable to take a single step out doors and try it thus instead. It’s better for your cardio.

The internet is not good for your cardio.

Cardio is sexy, leads to sex, and actually is sex too.

Whilst the internet might lead to sex – it certainly doesn’t do so in a sexy fashion; a click of a button is neither romantic, or attractive. ‘Sexy’ is almost as important as sex itself.

‘Sexy’ is a reason I am involved in things and with people, but aside from my wife – they’ve nothing to do with sex, but they sure as hell are sexy.

Indeed, I have many sexy friends that I don’t find remotely attractive, which I tell to the remaining few of them all the time.

In fact, the benefits of the internet, as broad, varied and accurate as they may be, seem to be proven in the individual instead of en masse.

The individual – who used internet forums to lose weight. Most are gaining weight from lack of movement.

The individual – who developed their friendship circle of like-minded folk to enjoy happily. Must feel more alone than ever, especially when self-judging in comparison to the beautiful people online.

Beauty is important a point that the internet has hammered-home and lost altogether. Once, physical beauty of a person was an exception. Of course everyone is beautiful but no they’re not. Quite a few are pretty, or kind of handsome, but few are beautiful.

The internet has reduced the unique advantage of beauty as something special. Beautiful is now ‘just-another-beautiful‘.

Naturally, everyone wants to breed with someone that is actually attractive – and all the more so if beautiful. I do, anyway. But now that physical beauty is everywhere, thanks to an online ubiquity, it’s not quite the same selling point as it once was.

Therefore, I predict now that in soon-years, physical beauty as a focal point will be replaced in favour of a unique face, one that suggests character over symmetry; balls over cheekbones. Smells good.

The internet has no scent.

It is whiffless, and this should tell us all we need to know.

But there’s more.

Dogs do not approach the internet, despite being such as prominent feature on social media and veterinary sites. If a dog doesn’t trust it,

If the internet were to attend parties, it would be the rather uncouth character fraudulently telling everyone about ladies he’s been with, attempting to sell you a variety of essentially unnecessary items but primarily penis enlargement pills, and speaking in acronyms and then delightedly rolling his eyes when older folk don’t understand.

The internet ain’t got no class.

Oscar Wilde would not invite the internet to one of his soirées, nor would he have need to use the internet as I just did to spellcheck “soirée”.

Another subject I needed to check with online help was the names and faces of the original 150 Pokemon.

I’ve wondered for a while if my two young children (3 and 5) would have their attention held by the programmes I watched when I was their age. So I gave the original pokemon series a go on YouTube.

Sure enough they loved it, but whilst they enjoyed the stories – laughing and silent at all the right moments – I was squirming with resistance to the urge to search online for the full 150 names and faces of each Pokemon.

I succumbed.

This is the data I do not need, but in that scenario I felt I could not do without it and now, in my brain, its there.

150.

So many minutes.

Afterwards, and indeed at the time, I preferred to spend the time with my children, watching them enjoy the cartoon, or I could have turned to this blog and make it a little better, or even dropped and given a solid round of push-ups. But instead, I had to have the instant knowledge, and it is distinctly unsexy.

Yes, of course the internet is fantastic when it’s needed, but we don’t need it as much as we use it.

There’s nothing wrong with a healthy thirst for knowledge, but there’s nothing wrong with not knowing something every now and then, let alone immediately.

And yes, this blog is on the internet, but nobody is trying to suggest this blog is a good thing. I could take it offline, and just comment your address below so I can post each blog to you in the mail.

The internet isn’t sexy. I don’t like online banking, which is remarkably more convenient and cost-effective, because I prefer bank tellers. I dislike home online-streaming services, but really want to go to the cinema and smell the popcorn. I prefer not to order online goods, as I really enjoy getting lost and confused in a department store, hoping my wife will come and find me.

It makes the world something you view, rather than be party to the people in it, and with head full of the kind of inane you don’t want. And I know what kind of inane I like – it smells like popcorn and is trusted by dogs.

If you haven’t got people – you haven’t got much.

And I’ve got some.

Sam